The appellate court distinguished between access to publicly available profile information on LinkedIn, which cannot be "unauthorized," and access to information on sites which are restricted to users who sign in to the site with a username and password. "The 9th Circuit's latest decision relied on the Supreme Court's determination in Van Buren that when information is publicly accessible, no authorization to use that data is required. There seems to be a good amount of videos and content on Khan that doesn't require a login. A company was legally allowed to scrape all all no login required data from linkedin even when this was against the TOS. This 9th circuit decision against Linkedin is pretty clear. I think it would be legal to scrape the Khan academy site of anything that doesn't require a login to access.
# because the last row is a duplicate we need to delete the last row Url = '' + channel_id + '&maxResults=50&order=date&type=video&publishedBefore=' + published_date + '&key=' + api_key # save the channel_id and video_id in a dataframe Response = requests.get(url=my_url).json() My_url = '' + channel_id + '&maxResults=50&order=date&type=video&key=' + api_key Channel_id = 'UCvShfJtvC2owV0AFi_qyykA' # The Helix Center
0 kommentar(er)
